Research Commentary: A Rejoinder: A Reflection on the Evolution of a Replication Study
author responds to comments made by Alan Schoenfeld (2018) and Jon Star (2018)
in their commentaries on replication studies in the January 2018 issue of JRME. The author posits that replication
studies are undervalued because they not only, by definition, recreate past
research but, perhaps, also bring into question another scholar’s expertise.
This is available to members of NCTM. If you are interested in a NCTM membership, join now. You may also purchase this article now for online access.
Write for JRMESubmit Manuscripts Review for JRME