12 Math Rules That Expire in the Middle Grades

  • 12 Math Rules That Expire in the Middle Grades

    By Karen S. Karp, Sarah B. Bush, and Barbara J. Dougherty, posted November 2, 2015 –

    Ed. note: In the November 2015 issue of Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, authors Karen S. Karp, Sarah B. Bush, and Barbara J. Dougherty initiated an important conversation in the middle-grades mathematics education community. We are dedicating this discussion space as a place where that conversation can continue.

    In our article, “12 Math Rules That Expire in the Middle Grades,” we point out 12 rules commonly taught in middle-grades mathematics classes that do not hold true over time; in fact, these rules “expire.” For example . . .

    Rule 1. KFC: Keep-Flip-Change

    When learning to divide fractions, students are sometimes taught to KFC (Keep-Flip-Change) or told “Yours is not to reason why, just invert and multiply.” Although both versions align with the standard algorithm, students might overgeneralize this rule to other operations with fractions. Additionally, these mnemonics and sayings do not promote conceptual understanding, making it challenging for students to apply them in a problem-solving context. Instead, division of fractions can be linked to whole-number division by asking how many groups of the divisor make up the dividend. Although students will eventually use the algorithm, they should gain a conceptual understanding of dividing fractions through the use of physical models or other methods, such as the common denominator strategy. Expiration date: Grade 6 (6.NS.1)

    See the article for the other rules that expire.

    We also provide instances of expired language and notation. For example, using the term “reducing fractions” may cause students to think that the fraction value is getting smaller. Instead, we should use the term simplifying fractions, or instruct students to write the fraction in simplest form or in lowest terms.

    Similarly, plugging in a value for a variable is not a mathematical term. Instead, the language used should be substitute a value.

    See table 2 (p. 214) in the published article for additional examples.

    Use the comment section that follows this blog post to submit additional instances of “rules that expire” or expired language that our article does not address. If you share an example, please use the format of the article:

    1. State the rule that has been shared with students.

    2. Discuss how students overgeneralize the rule.

    3. Provide counterexamples, noting when the rule is untrue or unhelpful.

    4. State the “expiration date” or the point when the rule begins to fall apart for many learners.

    If you submit an example of expired language that was not in the article, include both “What is stated” and “What should be stated.”

    By building a schoolwide plan for the consistent and precise presentation of rules, terminology, and notation used by all teachers, students will never find that something in their past instruction is no longer accurate. As we avoid these 12 Rules That Expire, we instead find ways to present a seamless and logical world of mathematical ideas.


    2015-11-02 Karp 

    Karen S. Karp, kkarp1@jhu.edu, is a visiting professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. She is professor emeritus at the University of Louisville in Kentucky, a past member of the NCTM Board of Directors, and a former president of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Her current scholarship focuses on teaching interventions for students in the elementary and middle grades who are struggling to learn mathematics. 

     





    2015-11-02 Bush  

    Sarah B. Bush, sbush@bellarmine.edu, an associate professor of mathematics education at Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky, is a former middle-grades math teacher who is interested in relevant and engaging middle-grades math activities.

       




     

    2015-11-02 Dougherty

    Barbara J. Dougherty, barbdougherty32@icloud.com, a research professor for mathematics education at the University of Missouri–Columbia, is a past member of the NCTM Board of Directors and the editor for the Putting Essential Understandings into Practice series. She is a co-author of conceptual assessments for progress monitoring in algebra and curriculum modules for middle school interventions for students who struggle.

     


               

     

    Leave Comment


    Please Log In to Comment

    All Comments


    Scott Brown - 2/10/2016 2:13:06 PM
    You state correctly the acronym FOIL expires in high school, when binomials are multiplied by trinomials. I would agree with Usiskin's emphasis on applying the "extended distributive property." Reason? I just had two university students state 2x+14+y=2(x+7)+y with the accompanying explanation, "foil out the 2."

    Alicia Luna - 11/28/2015 7:27:01 AM
    I agree with Ryan Stones regarding the usage for "point". I discuss with my students both the "proper" way to read a decimal number and the "common" way to read it by using the word "point". Speaking of decimals, another rule that needs to expire is "when multiplying by a power of ten, add zeros to the end of the number". While this rule works for whole numbers, it does not work for decimal numbers. For example, 5.7 x 1,000 does not equal 5.7000. I understand that, when students first start multiplying by powers of ten, they have not yet been exposed to decimal numbers. I suggest that elementary school teachers explain that, when multiplying by a power of ten, the digits move, so that we need to add zeros as placeholders. The result of multiply 4 by 100 is that 4 "ones" become 4 "hundreds". Moreover, when students start to work with decimal numbers, the rule stays the same: the digits move when multiplying by powers of ten. The decimal point doesn't really move (this is another "rule" that should not be established); it only looks as if the decimal point has moved.

    Anna York - 11/11/2015 3:48:42 PM
    When I taught grades 6, 7, 8 and Algebra I (private school), we had a "retirement party" in 6th grade for the x symbol as a multiplication sign. It was a great way to help students make the jump to using x as a variable and using different representations for multiplication. We only "retired" x because we would still use it in scientific notation. A rule I have run across that I would like to expire is KCC or "keep, change, change" when subtracting with integers. I stress to my students that you "add the opposite" which is the mathematical process . I think it is also problematic to tell students that you can determine which way the ray for graphing an inequality should go by matching the direction of the symbol with the shape of the arrow on the number line. It only works if the variable is on the left side which is not always the case. I also agree with Lori Burch about "cross multiply." If I had a quarter for every time my 8th graders and Algebra 1 students (boo-hoo) tell me that you multiply fractions by cross multiplying, I could retire tomorrow!

    Dorothea Steinke - 11/9/2015 10:27:02 AM
    A pair of "rules" that were missed: Multiplication always makes the answer bigger. Division always makes the answer smaller. This understanding only applies only for values greater than 1. When multiplying or dividing by decimals or fractions less than 1, students may fail to accept the answer because it is less than the number they started with in multiplication, or greater than the number they started with in division. One way to correct these "rules" is to return to concrete, physical examples (using objects which students can manipulate) before asking students to draw representations of the multiplication and division concepts. When the concrete and representational stages are solid, then students can accept the abstraction of the concepts.

    Brady Ward - 11/4/2015 3:02:15 PM
    "You can't take the square root of a negative number." I try to be careful to clarify, "In the real number system, the square root of a negative number is undefined," or, "the equation x^2 = -k (where k is positive) has no real number solution."

    John Golden - 11/2/2015 9:33:43 AM
    Do you know about Nix the Tricks from Tina Cardone and the #MTBoS? It's a free book with teacher generated list of ideas like this, now in 2nd edition. See http://nixthetricks.com/ or on Twitter https://twitter.com/hashtag/nixthetricks?f=tweets&vertical=default&src=hash.

    Carlos Castillo-Garsow - 11/2/2015 1:33:15 AM
    "Parentheses means multiply" expires with function notation, and is nearly impossible to fix. Rise over run. Slope of 3/4 means "over four and up three" or "over one and up 3/4" definitely expires with Calculus, but also expires with step functions, average rate of change for non-linear functions, or point-slope form done with any sort of meaning at all.